Comparisons —Which is the Best Storage Solution?
NAS, SAN, and DAS come into play when discussing business data storage systems. Deciding which one’s the best for you depends on many factors. Before we start comparing the three storage devices, let’s define each one briefly.
Types of Storage Solutions
- Network-attached storage (NAS)
- Storage Area Network (SAN)
- Direct-attached Storage (DAS)
NAS is dedicated file storage that enables numerous users and various client devices to collaborate and share data from centralized storage. You can access the shared storage from a local area network (LAN) via a standard Ethernet connection. NAS consists of either SATA or SAS disks arranged in a RAID.
SANs are complicated, interlaced systems most often utilized with indispensable data and databases. A SAN is not a single device but a cluster of storage devices that function as an integrated unit. Multiple servers or computers can access this dedicated network and share the storage resources. You can access data stored on the SAN from any computer on your network as if a hard drive is attached to your computer.
Direct-attached storage is a reasonably simple, low-maintenance, low-cost solution connected directly to a host computer without passing through a network. You can attach the storage internally or externally and access the data straight from the host computer. Other users must go through the host computer to work with the data.
Let’s compare the NAS, SAN, and DAS to help determine which solution would benefit your environment the most. Storage capacity, scalability, reliability, ease of management, and budget are key factors to consider. Your choice depends on which factors are relevant to your needs.
Comparing NAS with SAN and DAS
Comparing the critical features of NAS, SAN, and DAS shows that they are not three competing technologies. They address different storage needs in different ways.
Uses/ Scalability
If you are operating a small or medium business, NAS has all the features you need–it costs little and is dependable and easy to implement. It can handle more data as you scale up.
DAS is best for small businesses that only need to share data locally and want a simple, low-cost, and low-maintenance solution. Larger DAS storage units can accommodate multiple disks in one enclosure but have a limited ability to grow and scale. So, if you expect to see business growth over a short period, this is not a good idea.
SANs are intricate, highly-efficient systems, perfect for mission-critical devices and enterprises requiring excellent storage performance and dependability. It can support extensive data distribution surrounding multiple host servers, storage devices, or even storage systems. You can add new hosts and storage as your business scales up.
Ease of Management
A NAS is a single system for file storage and distribution, bringing together data protection functions. It has a simple architecture with fewer moving parts that do not require network configuration changes. This simplicity allows ease of management and maintenance. A dedicated IT professional is often not required.
DAS’ storage system is a part of the host computer or connected directly to it. DAS is also less complex than network-based storage systems like NAS and SANS, making it easier to implement and maintain. As with NAS, it requires little to no IT support.
SAN’s architecture is more complicated than NAS and DAS. SAN is a network of intricate and interconnected devices. It requires significant changes in the existing architecture during implementation. It is pretty challenging to manage.
Reliability/ Redundancy
NAS is good at centralizing storing of data safely and reliably. It allows 24/7 multi-user access and offers easy data backup. Continuous operation and RAID configuration set NAS apart from desktop HDDs.
Although DAS is simpler to set up and configure, it may not have the same level of redundancy as NAS or SAN. It lacks the centralized management and backup capabilities that other storage platforms have. It doesn’t have the system to facilitate recovery should the server crash.
SAN storage is more reliable than traditional server disks because of its underlying hardware. It makes speedier backups and data storage possible. On the other hand, it is the software that makes SAN storage disks reliable. The software ensures that everything works continuously in backing up and other related processes.
Budget
Generally, NAS is cheaper than SAN. Although a high-end NAS will cost more than an entry-level SAN, NAS is usually less expensive to purchase and maintain. You will spend less with a NAS because it has fewer hardware and software management components.
DAS is the cheapest option as compared to NAS and SAN. DAS has a more straightforward and diverse range of external drives and a more negligible overall cost considering the storage and scale.
Conclusion
With the comparisons on scalability, reliability, ease of management, and budget—which solution is best for you? There’s no perfect answer. Every piece of hardware has its benefits and trade-offs. You have to know which benefits work for you best and which trade-offs you can disregard.
In choosing between NAS, DAS, or SAN storage, decide strategically according to the needs of your company’s data center. Each has its advantages, and it all depends on your priority. As you can tell, there are also lots of options with each type of storage. NAS, DAS, and SAN come in many forms, so keep exploring which one works best for you.
About The Author
